'Stand your ground' hearing held for woman who shot, killed husband
Published On: Apr 03 2014 03:53:34 PM EDT Updated On: Apr 03 2014 06:37:46 PM EDT
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -
A 44-year-old Jacksonville woman who admits to shooting and killing her husband is standing behind Florida's controversial "stand your ground" law as the reason why she pulled the trigger.
Callie Adams told Jacksonville police in 2011 that she shot her husband, Rodney Adams, two times during a fight inside their car because Adams was repeatedly punching her in the head. Police said the shooting happened at close range in the parking lot of a nightclub.
A stand your ground hearing for Adams was held Thursday at the Duval County Courthouse, a hearing that will determine whether or not this case ever goes to trial.
According to police reports, after an argument, Adams claimed her husband punched her repeatedly in the head, and the former Marine reached for her gun in the family car and fired.
In opening statements Thursday, defense attorneys argued Adams was standing her ground, citing years of physical abuse and what defense attorneys call "battered spouse syndrome."
The couple's daughter was the first to testify, telling the judge about the physical abuse she witnessed at home.
"And she said, 'Rodney, get out, don't push me,' and he said, 'Don't you tell me what to do.' And then he jumped on her," Janet Adams said.
She told the judge she and her sister were bruised from the spankings their father gave them, but prosecutors say those spankings didn't constitute abuse. Prosecutors also pointed to inconsistencies in Janet Adams' testimony about whether her mother was beaten with an open or closed fist.
"I did ask you point blank, was it open fist or closed fist," a prosecutor said.
"Yeah, you did, but I told you it was an open hand, but I'm telling you now it was a closed fist," Janet Adams said.
"But that's a problem because you're telling me something different than what you told me under oath before," the prosecutor said.
Rodney Adams' brother testified, saying he only witnessed violence in the Adams household one time over 20 years.
The couple's youngest daughter told the court about another incident where Callie Adams pulled a gun, years before she shot her husband.
"So you saw your mom pull the gun out and point it in the direction of your dad," a prosecutor asked.
"Yes ma'am," Loretta Adams said.
"And what happened then?" the prosecutor asked.
"My dad backed up," Loretta Adams said.
Shop at Amazon below and a percentage comes to freedom Doors Ministries
New Wu-Tang Clan Album: The Case for the World's First $5 Million Album
Are you a fan of the Wu-Tang Clan? How would you like to have the one and only copy that will ever be made of the influential rap group's new double album?
It can be yours, if you're the highest bidder. The only hitch: The offers are reportedly already running into the millions.
The album, "The Wu—Once Upon a Time In Shaolin…," consists of 31 tracks which have been recorded over the past six years. It was produced by Tarik "Cilvaringz" Azzougarh, "under the tutelage" of the RZA, a founding member of the group. The album features guest appearances by Redman and Bonnie Jo Mason, among others.
The music, we are told, will not be available digitally or in any other existing mass format. The plan is for the album to initially be a traveling exhibit, where fans can pay to hear it "as a one-off experience," before one buyer takes possession of it.
In a statement on a site devoted to the new album, Cilvaringz and the RZA explain the method behind their madness. "History demonstrates that great musicians such as Beethoven, Mozart and Bach are held in the same high esteem as figures like Picasso, Michelangelo and Van Gogh. However, the creative output of today's [recording] artists such as the RZA, Kanye West or Dr. Dre, is not valued equally to that of artists like Andy Warhol, Damien Hirst or Jean-Michel Basquiat… Is contemporary art overvalued in an exclusive market, or are musicians undervalued in a profoundly saturated market?"
OK, modesty isn't the RZA's strong suit. But Wu-Tang is definitely rap royalty. Each of the group's first two albums, 1993's "Enter The Wu-Tang (36 Chambers)" and 1997's double album "Wu-Tang Forever," topped the 2 million mark in U.S. sales, according to Nielsen SoundScan. "Wu-Tang Forever" sold 612K copies in its first week, which was the second-highest first-week sales tally of 1997, just behind Garth Brooks's "Sevens."
Wu-Tang's three subsequent studio albums didn't sell nearly as well: 2000's "The W" sold 1.1 million; 2001's "Iron Man" sold 470K; 2007's "8 Diagrams" sold just 202K. A statement on the album's site suggests that the new album was a conscious attempt to recapture the glory of the first two releases. "The album … is produced in the original Wu-Tang style of the 90s," it says.
The intriguing story has been picked up by more than 50 media outlets, including Forbes, The New York Times and Time.
Is this for real? Apparently. But it's hard to imagine that it will become a serious business model. It seems more of an attention-getting stunt. Wu-Tang Clan is releasing a regular, commercially available album, "A Better Tomorrow," in July. (If the group had known how much publicity this one would receive, they might have put "A Better Tomorrow" out now, to capitalize on all the press.)
Here's more from the statement from Cilvaringz and the RZA, so you can better understand their thinking. "We hope to inspire and intensify urgent debates about the future of music. We hope to steer those debates toward more radical solutions and provoke questions about the value and perception of music as a work of art in today’s world.
"While we fully embrace the advancements in music technology, we feel it has contributed to the devaluation of music as an art form. By taking this step, we hope to re-enforce the weight that music once carried alongside a painting or a sculpture. The album will be put on listening display in renowned galleries, museums, venues and exhibition spaces around the world for only the most dedicated to experience before it disappears into the private collection of a buyer. The public will know that what they will hear will be a once in a lifetime experience.
"…A new approach is introduced, one where the pride and joy of sharing music with the masses is sacrificed for the benefit of reviving music as a valuable art and inspiring debate about its future among musicians, fans and the industry that drives it."
Two comments in that statement suggest how this plan goes against musicians' natural instincts to have their music heard and enjoyed. Cilvaringz and the RZA write that the album will "disappear" into a private collection. An interesting word choice, and not something that most creative people want to have happen to their work. And they write that "the pride and joy of sharing music with the masses is sacrificed." That's a lot to sacrifice, no matter how big a check you receive.
The RZA told Billboard that the early response has been positive. "Offers came in at $2 million, somebody offered $5 million yesterday," he claimed. "So far [that's] the biggest number. I don't know how to measure it, but it gives us an idea that what we're doing is being understood by some."
Is a Wu-Tang Clan album worth $5 million? The obvious answer is that it's worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. But since neither of the group's last two albums has sold 500K copies, it seems high.
Still, desperate times call for desperate measures, and the music industry is in desperate shape. Just one album sold 1 million copies in the first quarter of 2014—the "Frozen" soundtrack (which sold 1,457,000 copies in the quarter). Just one other album sold 500K copies in the quarter: Beyoncé's "Beyoncé" (which sold 604K copies in the quarter).
(Beyoncé's album also had an unconventional release. It dropped suddenly in December, with no build-up or fanfare. The counter-intuitive strategy worked: The album sold 1,301,000 copies in the last three weeks of 2013.)
Other artists have experimented with unconventional release strategies in recent years. In late 2007, Radiohead famously employed a "pay what you want" approach for its album, "In Rainbows." The strategy may well have cost the album some sales, but it also created a huge amount of buzz. The album reached No. 1 in both the U.S. and the U.K. and wound up with a Grammy nomination for Album of the Year. It also set up a successful worldwide tour.
Prince and Jay Z have also challenged industry structures and conventions.
"The music industry is in crisis," states an "edictum" on the album's site. "Creativity has become disposable and value has been stripped out. Mass production and content saturation have devalued both our experience of music and our ability to establish its value.
"Industrial production and digital reproduction have failed. The intrinsic value of music has been reduced to zero. Contemporary art is worth millions by virtue of its exclusivity. This album is a piece of art. The debate starts here."
Singer Chris Brown turned over to federal marshals for D.C. trial
20 hours ago
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - R&B singer Chris Brown was taken from his Los Angeles jail cell by the U.S. Marshals Service and will be transported to Washington, D.C. for a hearing in a 2013 misdemeanor assault charge, federal authorities said on Thursday.
Brown, 24, was jailed last month after violating his probation when he was dismissed from a facility where he was receiving the court-ordered treatment related to his 2009 assault of his then-girlfriend, singer Rihanna. He will be taken to Washington, where he is scheduled to stand trial on April 17, U.S. Marshals Service spokeswoman Lynzey Donahue said.
Brown's lawyer Mark Geragos had asked the court to have Brown released ahead of the trial into his custody so that they could prepare for the trial and travel together to Washington.
A court hearing on the matter was set for Thursday, but Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James Brandlin canceled it and issued a written decision instead.
The judge said Brown's attorneys have been visiting him "on an almost daily basis" at the Men's Central Jail in Los Angeles to prepare for the D.C. trial, the City News service reported.
Brandlin issued an eight-page ruling on the matter, noting that while the transfer may cause "some inconvenience" to the singer and his legal team, Brown would not be deprived of his right to counsel if transported by federal authorities.
Brown faces a misdemeanor assault charge in Washington from an October 2013 incident where he was accused of allegedly punching a man who was trying to get a picture with him, breaking his nose.
The singer was sentenced by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James Brandlin to 90 days in a treatment program following his altercation in Washington.
(Reporting by Piya Sinha-Roy; Editing by Mary Milliken and Andrew Hay)